UDAAP is an acronym representing laws that prohibit Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices in the context of trade or business. This includes misrepresentation, deception, false advertising, or false promises. These laws emerged following the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was enacted in response to the 2008 financial crisis. The ultimate goal with these laws is geared towards protecting consumers involved in financial transactions, educating consumers on their rights, and allowing them access to information and resources to best inform their decisions.
The organizations which regulate and enforce UDAAP laws are the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC expanded the initial UDAAP laws in 2004 to include unfair and deceptive acts and practices. Some standards for unfairness, in particular, include if it causes or is likely to cause substantial injury to consumers, the injury is not reasonably avoidable by consumers, and the injury is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.
The Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), Fla. Stat. Sections 501.201 through 501.213, is Florida’s UDAP statute prohibiting deceptive, unfair, or unconscionable acts in conducting trade or commerce. It is weak in the sense that it does not strongly protect consumers from lenders and it gives blanket exemptions to insurers, utility companies, and holders of real estate licenses.
You must bring a lawsuit forth within Florida’s statute of limitations, which is four years. This means that it must be filed four years from the date of the occurrence of the unlawful act or two years from the date of the last payment in an unlawful act, whichever is later. A successful plaintiff can recover compensatory damages, but there are weak protections for consumers seeking punitive damages and attorney’s fees. The plaintiff must prove the FDUTPA’s three elements, which include:
- A deceptive or unfair practice,
- Causation, and
- Actual damages (proximately caused by the unlawful conduct).
UDAAP and Arbitration
Arbitration is an out-of-court proceeding where a neutral third-party (the arbitrator) hears all the evidence from both sides and makes a decision about the case, which may or may not be binding. Binding arbitration, the most common type of arbitration, means that the decision is enforceable in a court of law and participants agree to abide by the decision. Some contracts allow for non-binding arbitration, meaning that either party is free to reject the arbitrator’s decision and take the dispute to court, although this is less common.
Arbitration has many advantages over traditional litigation, including being faster, more flexible in scheduling, and more efficient. Arbitration also avoids the hostility that can accompany court cases, remains confidential, and allows for an arbitrator who is a professional in the field to be selected instead of a judge who may not have familiarity with the issues at hand.
If you have a UDAAP claim, chances are we can bring your claim in arbitration. Arbitration is a very useful tool for resolving disputes, and Agruss Law Firm, LLC can help. With our expert guidance, we bring the big companies to the table and provide the support needed to get your bills corrected, credit reports fixed, improper fees refunded, and more. Let us pick up the sword for you; you have nothing to lose.
We see you as a person, not just a client – and that makes us better at the work we do. We listen. We learn your story. And, as we help you get the money you deserve, we go above and beyond in a way most law firms never could and never would. Our unique formula has earned us over 1,070 outstanding client reviews on our website, an A+ BBB rating, and over 155 five-star reviews on Google. Call 888-572-0176, e-mail us at [email protected], or schedule a meeting with us here. We’re here 24/7.
Submit a Complaint filed by: Matthew11 months ago
Potential UDAAP and Fraud claims against a personally-guaranteed commercial finance equipment leasing company (copier - xerox). 5 Year contract with deceptive and unclear pricing. Have been overcharged for over 24 months with charges applied when I have never used the machine for over a year. I am wanting to work with you to negotiate an exit to the contract at a reduced cost or terminate all together.