Skip to content

General Overview

UDAAP is an acronym representing laws that prohibit Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices in the context of trade or business. This includes misrepresentation, deception, false advertising, or false promises. These laws emerged following the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was enacted in response to the 2008 financial crisis. The ultimate goal with these laws is geared towards protecting consumers involved in financial transactions, educating consumers on their rights, and allowing them access to information and resources to best inform their decisions.

The organizations which regulate and enforce UDAAP laws are the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC expanded the initial UDAAP laws in 2004 to include unfair and deceptive acts and practices. Some standards for unfairness, in particular, include if it causes or is likely to cause substantial injury to consumers, the injury is not reasonably avoidable by consumers, and the injury is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.

New Mexico

The Unfair Practices Act, N.M. Stat. Sections 57-12-1 through 57-12-22, is New Mexico’s UDAP statute. The statute is strong by including both unfair and deceptive acts and practices as violations and allowing the Attorney General to include specific unfair or deceptive practices as they emerge. The procedure is straightforward for the consumer except for the requirement for showing that the defendant acted knowingly.

Successful plaintiffs can recover compensatory damages, multiple or punitive damages, and attorneys fees. According to Section 57-12-10, “Any person who suffers any loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of employment by another person of a method, act or practice declared unlawful by the Unfair Practices Act [57-12-1 NMSA 1978] may bring an action to recover actual damages or the sum of one hundred dollars ($100), whichever is greater.”

UDAAP and Arbitration

Arbitration is an out-of-court proceeding where a neutral third-party (the arbitrator) hears all the evidence from both sides and makes a decision about the case, which may or may not be binding. Binding arbitration, the most common type of arbitration, means that the decision is enforceable in a court of law and participants agree to abide by the decision. Some contracts allow for non-binding arbitration, meaning that either party is free to reject the arbitrator’s decision and take the dispute to court, although this is less common.

Arbitration has many advantages over traditional litigation, including being faster, more flexible in scheduling, and more efficient. Arbitration also avoids the hostility that can accompany court cases, remains confidential, and allows for an arbitrator who is a professional in the field to be selected instead of a judge who may not have familiarity with the issues at hand. 

If you have a UDAAP claim, chances are we can bring your claim in arbitration.  Arbitration is a very useful tool for resolving disputes, and America’s Consumer Lawyer can help. With our expert guidance, we bring the big companies to the table and provide the support needed to get your bills corrected, credit reports fixed, improper fees refunded, and more. Let us pick up the sword for you; you have nothing to lose.

We see you as a person, not just a client – and that makes us better at the work we do. We listen. We learn your story. And, as we help you get the money you deserve, we go above and beyond in a way most law firms never could and never would.  Our unique formula has earned us over 1,070 outstanding client reviews on our website, an A+ BBB rating, and over 155 five-star reviews on Google. Call 888-572-0176, e-mail us at michael@agrusslawfirm.com, or schedule a meeting with us here. We’re here 24/7.

We are listening

We will respond to you at lightning speed. All of your information will be kept confidential.

Form successfully submitted!

Submitted Comments

Alan
10 months ago
In April 2023, my wife and I obtained an auto loan through Roswell Nissan, part of the Krumland Auto Group, which was financed by Arivo Acceptance. The dealership failed to fully disclose key loan details, including hidden fees and the true cost of interest. Since the loan\'s inception, we have endured ongoing harassment from Arivo Acceptance regarding payments, despite having paid over $18,000 on the vehicle within two years. The vehicle is now significantly upside down in value. At the time of purchase, I initially selected a newer, more affordable Nissan Frontier pickup, but the dealership insisted I only qualified for a more expensive, previous-year Nissan Pathfinder. Despite instructing them not to, the dealership shopped around for the loan, and they also added GAP insurance without my consent. I was pressured into signing the contract without being given adequate time to review it, and the payment figures kept changing during the process. After repeated requests and delays, I finally received a copy of the contract from Arivo on April 24, 2025. I have since discovered multiple deceptive practices, including the unauthorized addition of GAP insurance. The entire experience with both Roswell Nissan and Arivo Acceptance has been fraught with misrepresentation, lack of transparency, and unethical treatment.
Christian
1 year ago
I think I have compensable claim - damages related to a home purchase that became much more expensive due to erroneous collections claims by PNM which hit my credit weeks before closing on a million dollar home. I estimate 300-400 thousand dollars over the life of the loan. I can also demonstrate that I did not live at the house which for the erroneous bill was associated, and I called several times to rectify the issue.